Rape And The Mortal Rapists - 1437 Words

In ancient Greco-Roman mythic narrative rape is depicted as a normalised and often essential paradigm that is used to show the gods’ dominance over lesser beings. Numerous accounts represent the gods as having transcended the boundaries of justice and morality by highlighting their exemption from prosecution for rape in contrast to mortal rapists, who cannot avoid punishment. Furthermore, aetiological-rape myths reveal that only the gods could bring about creation through rape, whether it be the birth of divine offspring, the dawn of natural phenomena or the founding of new institutions. In this light, the divine rapists are better than the mortal rapists because at least their penetration can prove productive for narrative continuity.†¦show more content†¦On the other hand, mortal barbarian Tereus, who had locked up his sister-in-law in a hut in the woods and had raped and mutilated her, is served up his son Itys for supper as a form of revenge from his wife Procne . Likewise, Ajax and his fleet her subject to Athena’s wrath after he robs Cassandra of her maidenhood in the goddess’s temple . Thus, these mortal rapists seem to be bound to an ill fate while the gods are exempt from accountability. After closer examination it is noticed that there are tonal and textual differences between the myths of divine rapists and mortal rapist, these differences providing support as to why rape by gods seems less punishable than compared to rape committed by mortal men. Much of the Daphne and Apollo story carries a sense of excitement and titillation as Ovid replaces sexually explicit rape with descriptions of Daphne’s beauty and her running away: â€Å"She was graceful to see, as the wind bared her limbs and its gusts stirred her garments †¦ he gave the fleeing maiden no respite, but followed close on her heels, and his breath touched the locks that lay scattered on her neck.† (Ovid, Metamorphoses 1.526-7, 541-3) Apollo cou ld have seized and raped her immediately but instead attempts to woe her with words in a courtly manner. Upon Daphne turning into a laurel tree Apollo declares: â€Å"You (Daphne: laurel) will accompany the generals of Rome, when the Capitol

Erotic Ascension And Stylistic Hoverance The Symposium Body

Erotic Ascension and Stylistic Hoverance: The Symposium Body The initial sentence of the Symposium—â€Å"In fact, your question does not find me unprepared†Ã¢â‚¬â€operates with an odd and mordant brevity. The close sandwiching of â€Å"in fact† and â€Å"does not† is a performative linkage of qualifiers that, in consideration of later text, functions as stylistic foreshadowing—what might be read as subtle mockery of the dialogic form (in that the sentence responds to an unknown provocatory referent) also hesitantly establishes an opacity that accurately exemplifies the Symposium’s widespread use of stylistic hoverance: its complex layering and alternations among comedic, pedantic, philosophical, and didactic registers. â€Å"Does not find me unprepared† is gratuitous hesitance, a signpost for the winking comedic rhetorics of salutatory debate. In fact, your question does not find me unprepared—of course I shall fabricate an explanatory ascendance laced by the performative codes of circui tous humor. Just the other day, as it happens†¦ Threads similar to the above rendition of (impudent) stylistic interpolation continue throughout the Symposium, and often center particularly around questions (and imagery) of ‘the body’ as an ambivalent object of discussion, description, and desire. Diotima’s espousal of an ascendancy—arguably Plato’s ‘philosophical climax’—from bodily desire for the physical beauty of a young boy (â€Å"devot[ion] to beautiful bodies†) to a singular beauty that is eternal (â€Å"just what it is

Joseph Stalin Essay Free Essays

Stalin: Evaluation of His Leadership At the time, Stalin seemed like he was the greatest person on Earth. He made himself seem as if he was above everybody, both physically and mentally. After all of the revolts that were occurring in Russia, he just took over. We will write a custom essay sample on Joseph Stalin Essay or any similar topic only for you Order Now He went into power right after Lenin had died and took his place, over Trotsky who also wanted to rule over Russia. Well he didn’t and we can’t change that. All we can do is remember Stalin and remember all of the things he did to make people support him and his cause to industrialize Russia. Let’s talk a little but about how Russia was before Stalin came into power and changed up the whole game for Russia. As soon as the Czar of Russia (Nicholas II) was kicked off his throne, Russia’s peasant population came strong and in numbers. These peasants all set up something that was called the Provisional Government. The Provisional Government was formed in Petrograd, and was led first by Prince Georgy L’vov and then by socialist Alexander Kerensky, a prominent member of the Duma and a leader of the movement to unseat the Tsar. This government had really good intentions but they just couldn’t make it happen. And the fact that they made some not so smart choices doesn’t help too much either. The people of Russia wanted this government gone which launched the November Revolution led by Vladimir Lenin and the Bolsheviks. What they wanted to do was to gain freedom, land and political strength. And so they did; they overthrew the fragmented government and finally had accomplished what they set out to do. But just like the Provisional Government, the Bolshevik government was sure to fail too. This is where Stalin comes in; this is where he takes over. Joseph Stalin took over right after Lenin had died and in December 1924, Stalin declared himself the new Leader of the USSR and became the Dictator of Russia. Now at first, Stalin didn’t seem like such a bad guy. He actually seemed like someone who was going to bring Russia to their prime. Just look at Document One. He’s explaining to his people how far behind they really are compared to the rest of the world and that if they don’t do something soon, they’re done. All he wanted to do was fix Russia, to bring them out of their â€Å"hundred year lag† and to make them more powerful. That was the goal of his 5 Year Plan. Stalin had extremely high expectations for Russia now that he was in power, and he would do anything to achieve them. If you look at Document Two, you can see how high he set his expectations. And then again, if you look at Document Three, you could see the amount of success he had with both of his Five Year Plans. Production in some areas were increasing at a very rapid pace. He wanted to more than double the production that Russia was putting out. You can see how much better he wanted to make his country, but he would do anything for it. Joseph Stalin was a very determined man and he would do anything to get what he wanted. This is where his use of propaganda came in. What is propaganda? You can think of it as information that is spread for the purpose of promoting some cause. If you look at Document Ten, you can see how he was portrayed by many different artists. Well, the artists really didn’t have a choice but to portray him in a positive way. This is where you can finally see the â€Å"evil† side of Joseph Stalin. He used force to get what he wanted and many people didn’t see it. Eventually, his Five Year Plans backfired and really sent the peasants into an even deeper level of poverty. Not only did he send some of the peasants into even more poverty that they were already in, he even killed some of them or put them in work camps and starved them to death. (Document Seven). He wasn’t going to let anybody stand in his way and if they tried, he would kill them off just like that. So as you can see, once Stalin came into power, he really didn’t want to lose his command over the Russian country. He did anything he had do to keep power and although all his intentions seemed good, he was really a dictator who made things a lot worse for the lower class of Russia. It’s too bad that many people couldn’t do anything about it because he would kill off anybody that revolted against him. So although he was one of the most terrorizing rulers of Russia, nobody ever really knew because of all the things he did to hide his truly evil side. To the people, he remained pure and an amazing leader; but we all know about things he did to make himself seem that way. Sure, his intentions were good (industrialize Russia and catch up to the rest of the world), but all we can do is remember all of the methods he used to make people support him and his cause. How to cite Joseph Stalin Essay, Essays

Poetry commentary on success is counted sweetest Essay Example For Students

Poetry commentary on success is counted sweetest Essay Emily Dickinson basically sends the message that success, Like any other possession tangible or Intangible, Is only appreciated by those whom It Is not always readily available. Dickinson both clearly states this message and Implies It throughout the poem, and uses rhyme, Imagery, and irony to incorporate the theme that the one who holds success dearest to them is the one who never succeeds. The rhythmic pattern makes the poem flow together, using the rhyme scheme ABACA n the short, choppy stanzas, like a song. This typical rhyming scheme gives a light affect to the poem; creating the feeling of simplifies and achieving the feeling that the message is not buried deep in the poems lines and is easy to comprehend. Emily also uses Imagery to develop her message. She writes Not one of all the purple Host Who took the Flag today Can tell the definition So clear of Victory (Lines 5-8) and this paints a picture of the victor In the war, who does not understand to the full extent what his victory Is. ND Just counts It as another victory. The defeated, however, is in ;agony and knows how powerful success is and what affect it has. Dickinson also implies irony when she says that As he defeated dying On whose forbidden ear The distant strains of triumph Burst agonized and clear! (Lines 9-12) as she implies that the defeated is the one that actually feels what success is, even though he is not the one that achieved it. She implies that the message of triumph is odder in the ears of those who do not have it; those who have reached success have not felt what It Is like without success. Emails theme Is not atypical; she sends the message that one never fully appreciates what one has until It Is no more, because an abundance Is usually taken for granted. In this case, the possession that is not appreciated by those who have It Is success, because not being victorious is surely a greater loss than being victorious is a gain.